October 21, 2025

Modern Problems Require Modern Solutions: A Review of All That We See Or Seem by Ken Liu

image

This is the type of review that every critic hates to write.

All That We See Or Seem is a fantastic book. It’s well written, a slick, kinetic noir with fleshed-out characters and a world depicted more through the interactions and context than through leaden exposition. Its characters sing, its plotting is meticulous, and Ken Liu is a master of the craft.

While Ken Liu is a fantastic writer, that only makes the book’s glaring weaknesses more obvious. It’s a book where stakes have to be invented around the main character because she’s too good at her job, where the optimism around high-tech clashes with the modern-day realities of that tech, and where for every brilliant strength the book has, it feels like an object from the recent past, one divorced from the questions already raised in its cyberpunk ancestors.

In short, it’s a book that’s an excellent read, but frustrating every step of the way.

More, as always, below.

Keep reading

October 10, 2025

You Know You Do It To Yourself: A Review of The Twenty Days of Turin by Giorgio de Maria

image

The Twenty Days of Turin is a warning. Giorgio De Maria’s novel— which has influenced everything from death metal to Junji Ito (Uzumaki takes heavy influence from Turin, especially the image of the dry lakebed) to crime novels— takes Italy’s famed “city of black magic” and makes it the focal point for a series of assaults on the subconscious that turn ordinary civilians into super-strong sleep-deprived murderers in a story that descends into hallucinatory madness the more its mysteries are revealed. In the process, it raises significant concerns about how fascism operates, but also how our own thoughts can be manipulated and misused to make us more pliable. It’s a paranoid, disturbing, and brilliant work about the horror of human potential, one that leaves no one free of its disquieting indictments.

Keep reading

August 15, 2025
A Review of The October Film Haunt by Michael Wehunt

image

The October Film Haunt is a strong contender for the epic horror novel of the 2020s.

This isn’t something I say lightly, and I will no doubt be siloed for being too positive about a book. It’s cool, I’ll take that L. I have my issues with it, but in its exhaustive coverage of the present horror moment, expansive cast, continent and age-spanning plotline, and dark depiction of the power of art and audience it rivals (and might even be a pessimistic mirror to) The Great and Secret Show in my estimation. It’s a paranoid, meditative book marrying Wehunt’s gifts for describing loss and depression with an unnerving folk horror-meets-Eurohorror plot, tight quiet-loud-quiet pacing, and a cadre of villains with a twisted sense of justice. It’s a breathless, uncomfortable, and deeply strange look at how we live, what we love, and what we do to each other when those two things intersect. While it may be focused on the current moment, its themes of paranoia and loss go beyond the current time’s existential dread and extend both into the past, and into the uncertain future.

More, as always, below.

Keep reading

August 8, 2025

A Reprint of Reflections on Reading It for the Fourth Time

image

This was originally written on Facebook and posted there in 2018. I found it worth reposting, so I decided to put it on my website for the enjoyment of people for whom the Facebook remains locked down. The following is edited and revised from that recollection.

So I finished It for the fourth time.

First, before we begin, allow me to just say that if you bring up the thing I know some of you want to, the thing that’s a kneejerk reaction to even mentioning the book, you will be blocked. I don’t care if I’ve known you all my life or for ten minutes, this is not the time or the place to test me. If you think this is a bluff, well, it was nice knowing you.

The first time I read It, I was fourteen years old, and that’s really a terrible time to read the book, because you only understand half of it. Especially when you live in a sizably affluent suburban idyll and your worst struggles are verbal and psychological. I loved It, but there’s no way to “get” it when you’re fourteen and haven’t experienced too much yet. Mostly, I was just terrified of the creature to the point of never being able to use the bathroom without at least a hint of apprehension for fear that it would get me in there. I read It compulsively, forcefully, because I knew that at the end, the monster would be dead and I could relax. Because as long as the book was open, I would be carrying that monster with me, carrying the horror and malaise of Derry and the thing that used it as its hunting ground within me. Those last pages got me, but I’d never understood them.

Tonight, when the Derry Library’s glass walkway exploded, I almost cried. I didn’t, because it’s difficult for me to cry, but I almost did. Because I understood that, in his own unsubtle way, Stephen King was describing something that’s bothered me for a long time, something personal, something he can put into words that I can’t. The way the memories fade, those last moments where Bill stands and watches the Barrens fade to dusk, the end of the book where Mike slowly loses his memory, it’s the feeling that your past has become a foreign country and you can never truly go back there and be who you were. You have to try and hold on to the moments here and there, but you start to forget, things start to warp and change, people tend to vanish or fade away. It isn’t a book for younger readers, it’s a book for older readers about being young, about creating a place and a very specific set of memories, not nostalgic, not traumatic, but sincere. Genuine.

It’s a sadness no kid knows, because they haven’t lost it yet. It’s the sadness of knowing things were there and then weren’t, that things have a different meaning now than they do then, and some people can hang with that. Some people embrace that. Some of us take longer, because we knew what we were and what we were doing, and then suddenly we’re in a place where none of that is true.

On my bookcase, The Talisman is right next to It, and I think that makes some kind of odd sense. The Talisman is the story of a young boy who comes of age in a traumatic time fighting monsters, and it’s triumphant. Jack wins at the end, and being who he is and who he’s become is that win. The world explodes and the bad people die because everything is finally right with the world.

It is the dark mirror to that. The town explodes and the bad people die, same as in The Talisman, but the town is literally collapsing and all that’s good gets swallowed with the bad. The monster’s dead and the trauma’s all resolved, but with it go the memories of Derry and the deep bonds the heroes have. The Talisman ends with the magic still there. It ends with the magic fading away, with Bill taking one last ride on his childhood bike to do one last thing with the magic the town has left. In the end, the heroes leave, everything fades, and the final bridge between the weird, dark fairytale of adolescence and the more grounded, downbeat melancholy of adulthood finally shatters with that defeat. Bev’s still got to take care of her friend and the disappearance of her abusive husband. Bill’s still got to take care of his wife. Mike’s still got to finish his book and live in a post-It world. They won, but it’s bittersweet, because some part of them was lost in the attempt, and because their lives go on with this weird gothic fantasy part erased entirely.

It’s not happy, but there’s a beauty to that loss. There’s a beauty to the book closing, to that ending. It’s wistful, but the happiest thing the Losers could achieve in the world of It is closure, and they got it. In spades. The melancholy makes it real, somewhat, in a way.

You can say what you like about Stephen King, that’s why I read him, because there’s that part of me that he always manages to find a way into, because for some reason when he’s on, he reaches that soft, secret part of me, of so many Constant Readers. A good King book will run me over like a goddamn Mack truck. And when he’s off, well, hell, it’s still a pretty damn good story, right?

Anyway, I’m kinda fading. I shouldn’t have lit up while reading. It remains one of my favorite books, probably even more so now. Good night, and hope any part of this made some sense.

July 28, 2025

cellspex:

nightowlqueen:

best part of KPop Demon Hunters is all the ridiculous faces the girls make

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Nobody remembers right before Frozen came out there was an interview with a Disney animator that said there wasn’t much they could do with women’s faces because they “needed to stay pretty"

Moon Over June was the first shot fired in a revolution, apparently.

(via phantasypunk)

July 8, 2025

Generational Aliens: A Review of Uncertain Sons by Thomas Ha

image


Uncertain Sons is a lonely book.

That’s the easiest way to describe the feeling of odd melancholy and isolation I had when reading the much-anticipated debut collection by Thomas Ha— loneliness. While there’s a quiet beauty to Ha’s various worlds and those who inhabit them even at their most horrifying, and a deep understanding of internal logic that allows Uncertain Sons to navigate even the most bizarre premise (probably “Alabama Circus Punk,” about a consciousness controlling a family of robots getting hacked via linguistic terrorism) with deft ease, there’s a sense that Ha’s protagonists are, more than anything else, apart. Not completely connected to the madness and weirdness going on around them, no matter how commonplace it might seem.

It’s this underlying thread that Uncertain Sons uses to broach larger topics and push the boundaries of its strangeness, covering everything from familial stress under apocalyptic threat to modern fairytales of demonic gentrification (it is rare to find an author that actually gets the idea of suburban gothic in the modern age) and generational trauma in an age of bioengineered xenofauna. Throughout it all, it maintains a deeply human melancholy, elevating it above the surrealist portraits and darker fiction of its peers into something strange, affecting, and beautiful.

The “apartness” of Ha’s protagonists is essential to the work. While the foreword (an in-depth look at Ha’s work by critic (full disclosure: and colleague and occasional rival and friend) Zach Gillan) claims that Ha’s protagonists must continue their lives even in the face of catastrophe, the catastrophes Ha explores all have a singular focus, one that wraps around a central thread and forms the true connective tissue of the collection: isolation. It would be cheap to map Uncertain Sons directly to the 2020s and claim that easiest of layups for critics, “relevance,” (especially with stories like “Balloon Season” directly addressing quarantine dynamics and the shrinking of empathy down to a family unit and to some extent a single person), but loneliness and isolation are deeply intertwined with this decade.

To his credit, Ha’s exploration of isolation and apartness is all-encompassing— his protagonists are “apart” because they refuse to take part in frankly upsetting traditions like “Sweetbaby”’s macabre “Christmas dinner,” because they’re not being slowly taken over by AI-spawned imbecilic creatures like “The Mub”’s title monster, or simply because they were here longer and have their own concerns like in the collection’s strongest story, “Where The Old Neighbors Go.” Isolation and apartness are in no way a bad or othering thing in Ha’s work. Nor is “being different” or “apart from the crowd” automatically a good thing. The sense of paranoia in stories like “Cretins,” where the narrator is forced into a routine due to a chronic illness that makes them fall unconscious at random times, “The Sort” where a father and son on the run have to avoid being found out as genetically engineered humans, or “The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video,” where the main character must avoid a conspiracy after a “dead book” he found that has its original ending all show just how unnerving things are when you can’t go along with the crowd. The difference between a statement and an exploration is that an exploration shows all of it— good and ill, and uses that to advance its points from that perspective. There’s a clear empathy for Ha’s subjects that exists even when they might be unpleasant, a sense of humanity even to those who are a little inhuman.

This sense of apartness is underpinned by Ha depicting these worlds mainly through context. There is no sense of ambiguity to Ha’s stories, only one of inhabiting. The way media in “Window Boy” depicts postal workers and grackles immediately sets up both in the story, grackles being something unnerving and birdlike, the postal-worker cyborg foreshadowed by the cartoons Jakey’s abusive father watches in his den. The horror in “Sweetbaby” doesn’t just come from the monstrous gatorlike creature (think a flesh version of SCP-682) or the perversely cheerful decorations, but from the sense of wrongness that immediately turns ritualistic. There’s detail to the places Ha chooses to explore— any good writer knows how to detail— but even before Ha “unveils” more details or fleshes things out, there’s a sense of knowing what this world is and what inhabits it. This also lends itself to the possibility that these stories are more connected in some way, some grander picture of an unnerving future of interdimensional travel and bioengineered monstrosities (Ha in his afterword claims only three of these stories are directly connected— “The Sort,” “House Traveler,” and “Uncertain Sons,” but allows the reader room to interpret as they please), a fully-realized world that really only the author needs to know all the details of.

It’s a world connected by humanity, family, and isolation most of all. Generational trauma and the things passed down from family member to family member, social connection to social connection, form that central support of Uncertain Sons. The refrain of the title novella— “Uncertain fathers make for uncertain sons"— is a chilling coda on a collection that sees each story built on a foundation of technology, advancement, strangeness, and toxic social politics. "Sweetbaby” takes the “golden child/scapegoat” dynamic found in abusive families to a horrid degree where the former eats the latter repeatedly, “Window Boy” has two detached parents (the father being blatantly abusive) ready to send their kid out of their sheltered existence and into an even more sheltered existence, and “Uncertain Sons” itself involves a son carrying around (and somewhat dependent on) the voice of his dead father even as he grows into a loner determined only to destroy Behema and leave his father at the remains.

Despite this trauma and alienation handed down from generation to generation, Ha’s empathy comes through here, too. While there are obvious exceptions, most of the characters in Uncertain Sons have if not logical at least understandable courses of action. It’s another sign of how broken these worlds are, that wisdom and knowledge are handed from people who have no idea what they’re doing to people who also have no idea what they’re doing. There’s a tragedy and melancholy to the stories in Uncertain Sons, even the ones that end in a relatively upbeat fashion. The uncertainty (if you’ll pardon the word choice) is part of the point— nothing really ends definitively, it just continues on to the next point.

Through all of this, Uncertain Sons doesn’t offer an argument on isolation and alienation, but instead explores it in all its various forms, and how it can be both a boon to some and a detriment to others, each one passing their uncertainty, trauma, and experience to their descendants and those that come after. It’s an experience that’s unnerving and melancholic, but full of empathy and life (both malevolent and otherwise). Most of all, it’s a brilliant debut collection, an exploration of who we are when all we have is ourselves and our own received wisdom, and one of the best collections of the year.

June 29, 2025

homunculus-argument:

A good rule of thumb for AI is “would you trust a trained pigeon to do this?”

“We trained a pigeon to recognise cancerous cell clusters and somehow they’re really good at it” okay great, that’s something that could plausibly be a thing.

“We trained a pigeon to recognise good CV:s and left it in charge of sorting through all our job applications” uh perhaps consider not doing that.

Problem being of course that I would want a trained pigeon doing all these things. Just imagine, you could dress them up in a business suit and have them use a rubber stamp you adapt so that they can hold it in their beak.

July 9, 2023
The Inconsolables by Michael Wehunt

image

Time for another bit of accountability— today we’re apologizing to Michael Wehunt and Doug Murano, as Bad Hand Books sent me an e-copy of this and unfortunately the bizarre nature of my work schedule in the past few months also engulfed this. Doug, Michael, I’m sorry. I hope I do this justice

I’ve tried and failed to write this intro over and over again.

It’s not because it’s particularly difficult to describe The Inconsolables by Michael Wehunt, a collection of stories centered around grief, loss, and simply the spaces in ourselves where something is missing. No, the difficulty here is recommending a book, going “if you have ever had the unique experience of being in the same place these stories describe, this book will fuck you up. But you should definitely read it.”

You should definitely read it. Wehunt navigates the horrifying spaces of grief, loss, and depression in a disturbingly genuine way, pairing them with images out of nightmares that perfectly match the idea of something clawing its way into your empty spaces to live. Despite all this, a lot of the stories end up feeling hopeful, or at least end on a note of enough ambiguity that the anguish and dread don’t feel relentless. It’s a collection that perfectly manages the balance of dread, mild optimism, despair, and some truly disturbing, imaginative visions.

The Inconsolables is a book that demands you let it in.

More, as always, below

Keep reading

July 6, 2023

The Marigold by Andrew F. Sullivan

image

Hello. Unfortunately, as the last few months have been a rather chaotic mix of radio silence, frantic holding patterns, a deluge of information, and me attempting to force myself to get off my ass, I fucked up. Way up. Then I forgot the login to my own website, which seems like a reasonable conclusion to this particular chain of events. Andrew, I apologize. Hopefully in some way I can make this up to you.

I’d like to begin with a little bit of bombast. It’s awards season, and being awards season we find ourselves once again preoccupied with the books we read that “deserve it” and the nature of popularity contests and overlooked nods. So let me get this right out front, because I need to have it said, I watched politely and silently as books I loved slipped silently beneath the waves while working for editorial media. I’ve borne witness to thousands of ignored revolutions and outright robberies in my capacity as a professional critic, so allow me a single provocative moment while I’m editing for myself here and am allowed to be somewhat more uncivil:

Sleep on The Marigold at your own fucking peril.

The book is a riot, a complex satire as pitch-black as the fungus Sullivan unleashes upon the city of Toronto, detailing in its own way (a way similar to the low-budget punk dystopian films of the ‘70s and '80s but with much more control and ability to execute its vision) the multi-headed hydra holding a city hostage, a sickening infection to which all are susceptible. It’s an all-encompassing view from multiple characters of how deep the roots of power can go, managing to be both a nasty guided tour of fungal dystopian hell and the most effective satire of toxic urban power dynamics I’ve read in quite a while.

More, as always, below.

Keep reading

February 4, 2023
Everything The Darkness Eats Is a Brilliant, Complex, and Dark New England Gothic

image

Everything the Darkness Eats, the new novel from Eric LaRocca, is a brilliant, complex snarl of a book. Taking elements of the New England gothic style of horror, LaRocca’s own talent for blending disturbing scenes with startling emotional and physical vulnerability, and a sense of constantly escalating impending doom, it draws the reader through a devastating exploration of grief and the awful lengths it can drive someone to. But while there’s plenty of disturbing moments and devastation to be found, LaRocca’s emphasis on complex characterization and his focus on the lives and intersecting fates of his cast, as well as a refusal to give them any easy answers or neatly tied-up endings to their various stories that turns the book from something familiar into something newer and far more devastating than the average gothic horror yarn.

In Henley’s Edge, Connecticut, people are disappearing. Led to their unusual fate by Heart Crowley, a man of eccentric manner and supernatural influence, they find themselves drawn to his large mansion and the terrifying power he keeps contained in his basement. But no one merely disappears, and Crowley’s abductions cause ripples through Henley’s Edge that affect everyone– Malik, a police officer tasked with investigating the disappearances even as he and his husband Brett deal with politely sinister homophobia from their neighbors and terrifying hate crimes; Ghost, a man with a parasitic sprite that feeds on his negative emotions; and Gemma, a young woman simply trying to go through life while providing for her blind daughter Piper. All will cross paths with each other, and all will be drawn towards Crowley and his mansion’s bizarre occupant. The question is what will be left of them afterward.

What LaRocca excels at in Everything the Darkness Eats is building a sense of impending doom. Heart Crowley’s pattern is established early, with the old man strolling into a church thrift store and walking out with his first victim, the narration entirely from her point of view as she feels more and more of her every thought being wiped away by whatever force Crowley commands. It’s a powerful scene, with Ms. Childers never realizing fully what’s happening before it’s too late and the reader helpless to watch her. Even though you spend maybe a chapter watching Ms. Childers get swallowed up, you still feel for her, something that only intensifies as Crowley targets characters who’ve been around longer in the narrative. The supernatural sense of doom is even paralleled with a more mundane sense as Malik and his husband deal with the series of mounting homophobic attacks, with neighbors and even the police chief pushing them to either stop being themselves in public or leave the town entirely, the escalation mirroring Crowley’s increasingly forceful use of his otherworldly powers. Even when the threat isn’t supernatural, there’s a sense of helplessness that’s utterly unnerving. It’s a perfect balance, allowing you to anticipate the horrors to come while still keeping the outcome uncertain enough that the reader hopes that maybe this time someone will actually win out.

That expert balance of the mundane and supernatural elements helps underscore the sinister air LaRocca imbues in Henley’s Edge. As Crowley goes about his dark mission to collect townspeople, Malik and Brett deal with the casual homophobia from their neighbors and even the chief of police, and a series of escalating attacks that end with a brutal hate crime and Brett in the hospital. Ghost spends his hospital visit arguing with the parasitic spirit curled around his neck, but the main focus of the scene is his interactions with Gemma and her daughter Piper, and the hopelessness they all feel at their respective circumstances. Things don’t just ramp up in one sense or the other, but mirror– Ghost even (unknowingly) passes by a kidnapped Malik while enacting a kidnapping of his own to try and save Crowley’s victims before the start of his ritual, for example, each protagonist growing more and more desperate in their attempts to escape the circumstances they find themselves in, the onrush of their impending fates only increasing the tension.

That sense of impending doom and the balance of mundane and supernatural horror wouldn’t be possible if it weren’t for the fact that LaRocca makes sure that you care about and feel for all of these characters. Horror cannot exist without some degree of empathy and sympathy– you have to care about the awful things happening to people for those awful things to have impact– and it’s especially important given the themes of Everything the Darkness Eats. There are no nameless victims or senseless sacrifices in Darkness. Most of these people have lives, homes, people who care about them. It makes the horror more intimate, more personal to see Brett and Malik’s life, to see them arguing over trying to make a home for themselves even as their lives get torn apart. To see Malik investigating the disappearances of Crowley’s victims and meeting their families, both tying him into the community and showing the absences left by the horrifying events in the plot. Even the monsters of the book are touched by past trauma, grief, and loss in their own way, those touches driving them to sickening and reprehensible actions. Grief and loss cause ripples, impact waves that spread out further than the people at their epicenter, and with his solid characterization, LaRocca makes sure every impact counts.

It’s important to note, though, that as guarded as Everything the Darkness Eats is, there’s at least some note of optimism in the work. Sure, the grief and trauma the characters experience lead them to do reckless and monstrous things, but there’s always that note of hope, that maybe the more sympathetic members of the cast will actually make it through their experiences– not intact, Darkness thankfully never feels like the kind of book where someone will escape unscathed– but in enough of one piece that with time and effort, they’ll eventually be able to move on from the horrible things they’ve witnessed. It would be easy for LaRocca to be cynical or pessimistic in a book like this, one that draws on both the very real horror of hatred and the more cosmic and gothic horror of the thing Heart Crowley keeps in his basement, but that note of hopefulness, the idea that things might get better, the idea that letting yourself feel and processing the complex emotions that come with awful life events is the right thing to do, feels more genuine overall than the darkness and pessimism would be here.

In the end, it’s how genuine all of it feels that makes Everything the Darkness Eats so effective. Eric LaRocca’s always been great at exploring the toxic and sometimes destructive ways we process complex emotions, and using that gift to explore grief and loss in the framework of a New England gothic (a subgenre that’s a fertile ground to explore those feelings) makes the book hit all that much harder. It’s a complex snarl of a work that manages both deeply disturbing horror and explosive catharsis, but avoids tying any of it up neatly or simply, allowing its damaged characters to exist without needing to be crushed or “saved.” Everything the Darkness Eats is a brilliantly sharp, nasty, and foreboding work of horror, one that understands the genre and emotions it builds on while pushing their boundaries to newer territory.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »